Network Effects: Stan Liebowitz and the MP3 Debate
by Miriam Rainsford07/22/2003
Editor's Note: This is an opinion piece presented by Miriam Rainsford, who is a known proponent of P2P file sharing. Miriam is a musician herself and brings that point of view to this ongoing discussion about the damage that file sharing may be causing to the artists and their labels. Miriam is not a lawyer. She presents her views here, however, as if she were arguing a case in court. This is a writing device and not intended to be viewed as a true legal argument. Whether you're inclined to agree or disagree with the opinions in this article, I think you'll find this a passionate counterpoint to some of the conclusions presented by the report from the respected Stan Liebowitz.
The past month has been one in which the attention of the music industry has focused with renewed interest on digital downloads, beginning with the success of Apple's iTunes Music Store and finishing on a sour note with the RIAA's announcement that they will now be pursuing lawsuits against individual file-sharers. In light of these developments, it is worth re-examining Stan Liebowitz's analysis of the impact of MP3 downloads on the music industry. Can we in fact ascertain whether actual damage has been done through the rise of peer-to-peer file sharing systems, or is the record industry simply afraid of change and too slow on the uptake of new formats?
Stan Liebowitz, professor of Economics at the University of Dallas, Texas, became a controversial figure during the Microsoft anti-trust trial, when he testified that "network effects," the phenomenon where market saturation determines consumer choice, were more likely to have been responsible for Microsofts' dominant position than anti-competitive practises.
He later found himself to be an unlikely ally of the file-sharing community, when he released a study commissioned by the Cato Institute asserting that file-sharing "should be causing the industry a lot of harm. But we're not seeing it". However, with his latest paper, "Will MP3 Downloads Annihilate the Record Industry? The Evidence So Far", he concludes that we are beginning to see an undetermined, yet detrimental effect of file sharing on music sales. On examination I am concerned by several obvious flaws in Liebowitz's logic and would suggest a revision: that there is as yet no clear evidence that can prove beyond reasonable doubt that MP3 downloads are solely responsible for the current downturn in CD sales.
I cannot categorically say that MP3 downloading has no effect on CD sales. Nor do I support the RIAA's claims that file-sharing is "killing the music industry." What I wish to emphasize, through analysis of Liebowitz's paper, is that we lack the proof to convict beyond reasonable doubt. And if we cannot convict MP3 downloads of this "crime" against the music industry with the same burden of proof that we would expect of a trial in a court of law, then it is unethical and indeed unconstitutional to pursue lawsuits against individuals for a crime which cannot even be established to exist.
If there is no body, one cannot be convicted of Murder One. Yet Jesse Jordan and the Princeton Four were charged with "killing the music industry," and gave their life savings in settlement fines, money which was to have paid for their studies. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that the RIAA are obtaining wrongful convictions in their drive to sue students and now even children for compensation against monies that they cannot even prove they have lost.
A Closer Look at Liebowitz
And so to Exhibit One (PDF), the expert analysis of Prof. Liebowitz. Even from the start, concern should be raised regarding the sources Liebowitz has used to obtain his data. Rather than commissioning an independent survey, Liebowitz takes his data straight from the RIAA (p.4), an institution which he himself admits manipulates sales figures to show "the picture they wish to portray about the conditions of the industry." However, Liebowitz does present the various biases that may be read into this data.
Liebowitz attempts in his work to take an impartial position, his stated preference as an academic being "to let the data tell... what's actually happening." But despite these attempts, and his healthy skepticism of industry hype, he cannot escape letting his personal opinions show below the surface, and through the channels who commission his work. In letting the data "speak for itself," Liebowitz opens his statistics to many possible interpretations, yet he chooses to dismiss these quite plausible alternatives one by one through methods which are somewhat less than rigorous.
These arguments would be better strengthened by using a combination of both pure data and opinion polls, in the manner in which Tempo, an independent industry analysis group, has demonstrated [see link below]. This gives a more accurate picture of where sales may have been lost -- or indeed, gained -- rather than the conjecture which Liebowitz employs.
The RIAA's figures present a clear decline in sales over the period 1999 - 2002. Yet Liebowitz fails to mention Tempo's analysis demonstrating a growth in CD sales through MP3 file sharing, as users are introduced to new repertoire and eventually purchase the CD. Indeed CD sales did rise during Napster's first year, a phenomenon Liebowitz does attribute to increased exposure through downloading. It's noteworthy that his study does not include statistics on "legitimate" MP3 purchases, focusing only on the drop in CD sales during this period. Given that he later refers to "media change" and "librarying" (where consumers duplicate purchases in a new format) as being a source of revenue during the introduction of cassette tapes, it seems implausible that he could fail to incorporate data collected through the many licensed MP3 download services.
One of the key arguments in favour of MP3 file sharing is that such librarying does occur, when P2P users download new songs, decided that they like them and then buy the album. Dave Rowntree, drummer with UK "Britpop" band Blur, confirmed this in an interview with the BBC's Breakfast program. He claims that figures on the effect of music "piracy" given by the BPI (British Phonographic Institute, the British equivalent of the RIAA) show a definite bias, and that independent studies support the theory that downloaders, like home tapers before them, are using the service on a "try before you buy" basis. He feels that it is inaccurate for industry associations to tar downloaders with the same brush as professional CD duplicators, and that while allegations of links to organised crime may be true for professional "piracy" rings, it is somewhat far-fetched to apply the same claims to students swapping files.
Perhaps it is the RIAA themselves, through their latest offensive against music lovers, who are driving their own audience away. Any parent knows that the harder one continues to push and push in an effort to discipline an unruly child, the more they will rebel. It is better to invest trust, in the knowledge that it will produce tenfold returns in mutual trust and respect for the parent.
The RIAA might do well to take a lesson from child psychology in its dealings with customers. Such trust was demonstrated by Apple in the launch of iTunes, a system with minimal DRM which until recently preserved the ability to share files across a network. Customers came in their droves to buy 99 cent downloads from the Apple musical jukebox, but their confidence suffered a blow when the networking facility was removed in iTunes 4.0.1. And by punishing and pushing their customers instead of respecting their trust, Apple then suffered in precisely the way they wished to avoid--a hack was quickly compiled which restored file sharing to the iTunes platform.
If Steve Jobs had left iTunes the way it was, he may have continued to enjoy the respect of file-sharers who had turned to legitimate purchases in order to enjoy a high level of service and respect. Given that the service enjoyed one million sales in its first week of use, and continues to attract sales, it would be hard to say that consumers are unwilling to purchase music in a downloadable format when the price is right and the level of user trust is seen to be reasonable.
The Album is not Dead
Ted Cohen, senior vice president of New Media for EMI, brokers of the iTunes deal, attributes iTunes' simplicity as a key factor in its success where others have failed. The system is integrated into the iTunes player, and is easy to use: "It really is actually the first application that is easier than Limewire or KaZaA". If it is easier to use a licensed system than to share unlicensed files, perhaps such positive reinforcement is a better avenue for the record labels to pursue, rather than continuing to provoke the anger of their own customers.
I asked Cohen about the implications that digital downloads may be having on album sales, as the Red Hot Chilli Peppers and Metallica both have shunned iTunes in the opinion that it is "destroying the album." Cohen points to figures on Coldplay's album and single sales from the first few weeks of iTunes' availability; "10 of the top 50 tracks were Coldplay. But the album wasn't in the top 50. The third week, the album moved into the top 10, and half of the tracks moved out of the top 50. So people saw how many good songs there were, and that its more than "there's only two good songs on the album" routine, and they started saying, "I'm going to buy the album instead of buying the single." And so the album went top 5, and the single tracks moved out of the top 25."
iTunes' capacity for tracking customer purchases is providing a more accurate picture of what the listening public want, and demonstrates clearly that the album is not dead. In fact, Cohen is exploring the possible extension of the iTunes service to include playlist compilations and richer media including background information on the band and their discography. He describes the current service as a musical "Quick Mart" : "People don't spend a lot of time in it because its pretty much, 'here are the top 100 songs, which one do you want to buy?'" By extending the service to a fuller shopping experience, Cohen and Jobs will be creating further reasons for users to choose a licensed service.
Back to Liebowitz
Returning to Liebowitz, other possible causes are given for the current drop in album sales which may fit with the popularity of the iTunes service. Listening to music takes time "and higher incomes do not necessarily lead to greater amounts of free time"(p.14). Assessing possible changes in entertainment preferences may help to establish whether our modern, busy lives could be contributory, as we may be choosing to spend that precious time remaining meeting friends, rather than listening to music at home alone. Unfortunately Liebowitz cannot share any conclusions about this hypothesis as his assessment relies purely on spending data.
Another suggestion which Liebowitz explores is that, given a limited income, consumers might be purchasing alternative items such as DVDs or videogames. "It is frequently pointed out, for example, that DVDs cost about the same as CDs, yet contain both pictures and sound, giving them an advantage that explains the shift away from CD sales" (p.20). But Liebowitz chooses to dismiss this possibility by comparing box office sales with CD sales, despite the obvious differences between cinema-going and home viewing.
It emerges from this study that, while Liebowitz might be a respected economist and academic, his logic leaves a lot to be desired. Attending entertainment events cannot be considered as parallel to DVD or CD purchases. Even using Liebowitz's own argument, with the pressures of modern life, we have increasingly less time to listen, and so it follows that purchasing the DVD might be favoured over time-consuming visits to the cinema.
Also, since Liebowitz fails to compare statistics of cinema attendance with purchase of the same title, he cannot accurately assess whether librarying is taking place alongside cinema-going, or whether DVDs are being purchased as an alternative. It would be better to collect such data through an independent market survey questionnaire. Indeed when Liebowitz quotes from a study by Veronis, Suhler & Associates on time spent by individuals on entertainment, his argument begins to hold water:
Published estimates indicate that listening to recorded music took approximately 45 minutes of a person's time per day, whereas going to movies took 2 minutes, watching prerecorded movies took 9 minutes, and playing videogames took 7 minutes. I do not believe it would be reasonable to argue, at the low time- levels of usage for these non- music activities, that changes in movie attendance, DVD usage, or videogames usage, for the population as a whole, could be responsible for more than a small portion of the changes in album sales discussed below (p.21).
By far the most interesting part of Liebowitz's study was the section "Has the Music Changed?" (p22), where Liebowitz considers the question "if mp3s are not hurting the record industry, what is?" and the possibility which is being argued by many professional musicians, that too much attention is being focused on teen-pop bands and the lowest common denominator at the expense of musical quality. While such a focus is often explained as a form of rationalisation in current economic conditions, it is widely believed to have backfired as sugar-sweet pop caters to the teen audience but is driving the adult listener away.
Liebowitz's analysis of this critical question again disappoints, as his method involves a comparison of concert revenues and record sales in a similar manner to his comparison of cinema-going and DVD purchase. He notes that "Interestingly, the years 2000 and 2001 had the largest real increases in concert revenues, the same time the record industry was experiencing unusually large decreases in revenues" (p.21). This is quite plausible when one stops to consider that those bands who are popular as live acts are rarely the same bands who feature in the Top 10.
In fact, many of the sugar-sweet teen groups are incapable of actual live performance, as their singing is usually manufactured through Antares Auto-Tune. Hearing the Spice Girls attempt to sing without accompaniment in a live television interview is enormously revealing. If a survey of concert attendance was to be conducted, it might in fact demonstrate that customers are finding a new interest in live music as an escape from the pap fed to them from the Top 40 charts. Or even that music downloaders are inspired to attend concerts of their favourite bands after hearing rare live MP3s circulated on the Web. There are, as ever, many possible explanations which point to the role of MP3 file sharing in promoting live and recorded music sales, none of which can realistically be found through examination of data alone.
Incomplete data also causes Liebowitz's arguments to suffer. While he makes a reasonable analysis of the decline in radio listening, and concludes that this fails to support disinterest in Top 40 music as the decline occurs across the board of musical styles and age groups, he has not taken into account changes in format of radio listening from FM radio to streaming media. Liebowitz skips digital format statistics entirely, which is an appalling oversight given that his study was written in the month that iTunes was launched. Perhaps his source is at fault - the RIAA would hardly wish to release figures supporting MP3 as a promotional tool, but they do have access to statistics on purchased MP3s from their own member services. Licensed digital media formats ought to play a vital role in any study which attempts to assess whether MP3 will "annihilate the music industry".
More convincing are the statistics Liebowitz quotes from the "Fine Report" given by the RIAA in the Napster case. Bias must obviously be kept in mind, but the report does indeed seem to suggest that the age groups 15-19 and 20-24 show a decline in CD sales in correlation with increased mp3 usage. Yet various factors should be born in mind, not the least of which being the lack of inclusion of licensed MP3 download statistics. Rising university fees and living costs over the last few years should also be examined, as students may lack the income to purchase the same amount of CDs as in previous years. This could support their apparent increase in MP3 usage. But is this really "killing the record industry?" If a student no longer has the income to purchase CDs, sharing an MP3 file cannot reasonably be considered for statistical purposes as a lost sale.
In considering the Fine Report, Liebowitz cautions the reader "to avoid placing too much weight on this analysis since these data are based on surveys, which are often quite unreliable" (p.24). I would suggest that it is in fact his own aversion to surveys which have caused holes to appear in his logic. But again, even the Fine Report does not present a full enough picture of patterns of student spending, presenting only two factors and omitting opinion polls. Returning to the analogy of criminal law, which is increasingly becoming the domain of file-sharing cases, one cannot convict beyond reasonable doubt without considering all the evidence. Insubstantial evidence is often good reason for a judge to throw a murder case out of court. And so, if we are to attempt to try MP3 for "murder" of an industry, we need to have at our fingertips every detail of forensic evidence.
Conclusion
Stan Liebowitz's study is indeed a thorough examination of the situation, perhaps more so than any other presently available. But despite the strength of his conclusions, when one examines the deep flaws in his logic, and the incomplete or biased nature of the evidence he presents, it is impossible to consider his study as admissible evidence in the trial of MP3 file sharing.
Particularly disturbing is his omission of iTunes and other licensed digital services, which may well give a fuller picture of consumer behaviour. Market factors are subject to sudden change and chaotic forces, and it is not normally considered reasonable to assess an economy to be in decline after only two or three years data. It is simply far too early to tell whether the drop in record sales over the period 1999-2002 is simply a blip on the screen, or evidence of further recession to come. Nor is it possible to assess reliably, without survey data, whether consumers are indeed copying instead of purchasing, or whether other factors, such as lack of income and the narrowing of musical style in teen-pop chart records have caused people to look elsewhere for their sources of entertainment.
If, as can be seen from this analysis, the evidence is indeed inconclusive, then it is unjust for the RIAA to move to pursue lawsuits against individuals without burden of proof. Instead, the industry should be taking a leaf out of iTunes' book and building on the success of fully-featured download services, which can offer better facilities, greater quality and more reliable connections as an incentive for their prodigal children to return to the fold.
References:
Ipsos-Insight 'TEMPO' statistics on music downloads and purchasing and http://www.ipsos-na.com/dsp_tempo.cfm
Miriam Rainsford is a composer, singer and songwriter in classical, electroacoustic and underground dance music.
Return to the OpenP2P.com.
Showing messages 1 through 13 of 13.
-
the future
2004-01-13 23:29:00 anonymous2 [View]
I haven't researched the numbers, but I have a friend who works at an important and large firm related to the music industry, and she seems to believe that even if the major labels aren't going out of business, they certainly are undergoing structural changes, particularly to the way they are going to model their business approach in the digital future. Ultimately, all the RIAA withc hunt stuff will dwindle and what we will be looking at is an industry that has to get off its institutional arse and look at how its going to find a new niche. This probably means being less involved in the manufacture of a physical object, and more driven towards the promotion of intellectual property. The future holds tha answer
-
PEER-PEER DOWNLOADS
2003-09-14 13:51:24 anonymous2 [View]
I am a musician and I learn my songs by listening to them over and over again. In the past before I had a computer, I got my songs by recording them from the radio and TV. I didn't purchasee them at the store or buy them from someone else, so I guess if the record company's want to keep me from listening to their songs without paying for them, they will have to quit playing them on radio and TV. I have several thousand songs in my database, but they are only for my use. There is a lot of the songs I have recorded from casette tapes and records onto my computer and then put them into my database. If I remember correctly when the VCR first came out, the movie industry was afraid they would go bankrupt because people were recording their movies instead of buying them. Movies are still made arn't they. Well I think songs will still be sold.
P.S. Do you have any casettes I can borrow?? Ha Ha
Warmest Regards:
deer slayer
-
Mp3 files
2003-09-11 02:25:11 anonymous2 [View]
Great info!!! I think the music industry should sit back and wait awhile.Times are chaning,they need to accept this.I mean anyone can always push the record button on there radio-cassete player when they hear there favorite song.Did this put the music industry out of business??? Personally I think MP3 files are a form of advertisment for the musicans and they should stop there complaining..
Thank"s for letting me express my opinion.
Bye BYE BYE
-
i think i read something like this on http://www.codon4.com
2003-08-19 19:06:52 anonymous2 [View]
i think i read something like this on http://www.codon4.com
-
it's all about the money.
2003-07-25 15:28:59 anonymous2 [View]
The RIAA has seen a goldmine in threats to individuals who can't afford to defend themselves against a monstrously large organization.
Let's face facts; some of the members of the RIAA are also manufacturers of electronic equipment.
Even in the seventies, manufacturers advertised that you could use their units to record your favorite tunes off the radio directly on to your cassette or 8 tracks. Also, have you ever seen a VCR without a tuner? They were MADE to record your programs, programs that are copyrighted.
Now these same people who have made the equipment and advertised that it was ok to record have changed their mind and want money for sharing MP3's. Music in a format THEY don't offer! If they started putting 200 mp3's on a disk and selling it for the same $15 I am sure the world would stop file sharing, but the recording industry is greedy. They put 15 songs on a disk (of which only one is worth a darn) that cost them less than 20 cents to produce and sell it for $15. We should sue them for price gouging!
To put it all in perspective, most records and movies are in the black (profit) inside of the first couple of days or weekend. NO ONE is starving in recording industry. If they are, perhaps the stars, CEO's and directors need to not be paid quite so much so the little guys in the industry could be paid better.
FINAL THOUGHT: If the RIAA has a problem with file sharing let them start by suing SONY, An electronics manufacturer and member of RIAA.
ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST WE PROTEST THE RIAA BY NOT BUYING CD'S OR GOING TO THE MOVIES THE ENTIRE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER. THERE IS STRENGTH IN UNITY.
besides, at the end of the month you'll have a nice chunk of change to buy blank CDR's with.
-
Stop kidding yourselves...
2003-07-24 13:45:53 anonymous2 [View]
The open source and file stealing reign of terror is drawing to a close. Soon Ashcroft will contact all copyright violators! Repent now! Pay up!
-
the crime...
2003-07-23 07:32:13 anonymous2 [View]
You begin-
"...if we cannot convict MP3 downloads of this "crime" against the music industry with the same burden of proof that we would expect of a trial in a court of law, then it is unethical and indeed unconstitutional to pursue lawsuits against individuals for a crime which cannot even be established to exist."
Of course, the industry doesn't need any evidence of declining sales from a legal standpoint- they have reason to believe that "making available" on a network is infringment. It's the hearts and minds thing they're after with these tears they shed over declining sales and their "decreasing ability to promote promising new artists", etc.
So you are actually battling them over a perception, not a legal point. I'd personally like it better if you'd left out the "criminal defense" angle and paid more attention to questions like just why exactly does Liebowitz stick his neck out drawing conclusions from such questionable data? -
the crime...
2003-08-09 15:08:17 anonymous2 [View]
The crime is with record companies over charging albums giving the prolitariate americans no choice but to steal. As a musician my self I frown upon the fact that the music buisness has changed from what souunds good to profitmargins and crewd laissez faire captalisim -
the crime...
2004-01-13 23:21:59 anonymous2 [View]
well, technically its not laissez-faire if you ask the government to use juridicial means to promote or prevent market actions, but I agree with you anyways
-
Other factors
2003-07-23 06:03:18 anonymous2 [View]
As someone who worked in music retail up until the 'break point', I can say that there are plenty of other factors that came to play, such as: retail pricing and MSRPs - margins on CDs just weren't as profitable as other mall stores' commodities, and the chains died or got consolidated. Warehouse retailers undercut prices and drove away sales, shutting down retail options to buy. And when you can get product A for $5 cheaper, why not? The warehouse buying experience is dismal, but is becoming the only option for live purchases. Once retail options waned, people went online to buy - and when they went online, and saw it for free, well, the choice was easy at that point. Still the same product, still instant gratification - all the things the consumers want.
That's not the labels' only crime, though: their lack of commitment to artists has truly created a decline in fresh, interesting music. I think that there have been about three CDs I've wanted to buy in the past four years; compare that to the dozens I used to buy yearly.
Ultimately, music is a product, and should be treated as such. If people don't want your product, you either make a better product, offer something extra, or otherwise market it differently. The music industry thinks it doesn't need to, that witch hunts are a better idea. Is this the Bill Gates School of Business or what?
-
We ought to have VCR's outlawed...
2003-09-14 19:00:57 anonymous2 [View]
Maybe the movie biz should be up in arms and suing people who record movies and tv shows...LMAO
VCR's should be banner in american homes cause someone might record something with a copyright.(again LMAO)
They should find a way to hack cable systems so they can sue users for recording movies...people recording movies is "killing" the movie industry.
hmm,
Music companies should be happy with the profits from concert tix and t-shirts.as many movies as i still buy minus those i record has not been something that movie co's have been affected by.
I think suing your fans is the wrong way to go,he music industry is thinking extremely short term-notlong term.
I feel for them as far as "the fear factor" that they might lose a little vacation pay..but by no means will they be going hungry.
I myself have downloaded CD's of live concerts that are not available on CD,nd I have purchased what is available on CD.I feel that they should start a P2P for live concerts for people to download for a reasonable fee with a quality rating beside it.(i have downloaded quality and shitty concerts)
I think they are over reacting (Look what happened with the VCR in the early 80's)but i can understand anyone trying to protect what they feel is rightfully their's all i am saying is this mirrors the origin of the VCR and the movie industry so far is totally unaffected.
Once again i am bummed that i can no longer download concerts that are unavailable on CDIwish someone would look into this and make these recordings available seeing as how most are much better than store bought CD's. -
We ought to have VCR's outlawed...
2003-10-05 20:49:49 anonymous2 [View]
I remember watching The Foo Fighters interviews live on our music channel "MuchMusic" up here in Canada a year or so ago....and lead singer Dave Grohl said something to the affect that the halabaloo over music is the same as the halabaloo over the blank cassette when they first came out.
He said something like in response to the "home taping is killing the music business" bumper stickers, someone came out with great "home-f**king is killing the prostitution business" bumper stickers.
:o) -
We ought to have VCR's outlawed...
2003-09-15 14:36:32 anonymous2 [View]
Thats right and what about tape recorders, you could record whatever you wanted when you wanted,and even record an entire album over the radio, or copy from one tape to another(as long as your not selling them)I dont have a cd burner so I cant be burning cds.but you can be sued just for downloading your favorite songs. thats b--- s---!!!









